Contesting a will

Contesting a will means asking a court to reject all or part of a will, usually because of problems with its signing, the will-maker’s mental capacity, pressure or deception, or a later will. A separate type of claim asks for financial provision even though the will is valid.

Jurisdiction
General — United States, England & Wales, Canada, Australia
Topic
Estate Planning
Last updated
Sep 26, 2026
Editorial status
Not yet reviewed by a licensed attorney

General legal information, published for everyone. It does not apply the law to anyone’s particular situation and is not legal advice. Laws change and differ by place; check the primary sources below.

Quick summary

  • Contesting a will means asking a court to reject all or part of a will, usually because of problems with its signing, the will-maker’s mental capacity, pressure or deception, or a later will.
  • A separate type of claim asks for financial provision even though the will is valid.
  • The rules and deadlines depend heavily on the country, state, or province.

What it means

Contesting a will means asking a court to reject all or part of a will, usually because of problems with its signing, the will-maker’s mental capacity, pressure or deception, or a later will. A separate type of claim asks for financial provision even though the will is valid. The rules and deadlines depend heavily on the country, state, or province.

How the law works

How the law usually works

A will normally takes effect only after the will-maker dies and the estate enters probate or another court-supervised process. The person challenging it is generally called a contestant, challenger, or objector.

Common grounds for challenging a will include:

  • Lack of testamentary capacity: The will-maker did not understand that they were making a will, the general nature of their property, the people who might reasonably expect to benefit, or the effect of the document.
  • Undue influence: Someone improperly pressured or manipulated the will-maker so that the document reflects that person’s wishes rather than the will-maker’s free choice. Ordinary persuasion, assistance, or a close relationship is not necessarily enough.
  • Fraud or forgery: The will may be fabricated, altered, signed by someone else, or made after false statements that affected the gift.
  • Improper execution: Required formalities, such as signing, witnessing, or the required number of witnesses, may not have been followed. Some places excuse technical errors in limited circumstances.
  • Revocation or a later will: A later valid will, destruction of the document, or another legally recognized act may have cancelled the earlier will.
  • Mistake: A court may sometimes correct or disregard wording that does not reflect the will-maker’s intention, although the available remedy varies.

The person challenging the will usually has to show a legally recognized problem. The person defending the will may rely on a presumption that it was properly made, especially if it was prepared by a lawyer and signed with the required formalities. The precise burden of proof differs by jurisdiction and by the ground being alleged.

A challenge to validity is different from a claim that the estate should provide more support. In England and Wales, and in similar systems, an eligible spouse, child, dependant, or other person may seek reasonable financial provision even if the will is valid. In the United States, Canada, and Australia, family-maintenance or surviving-family claims also exist in many places, but eligibility, property covered, and deadlines vary.

Common processes

  1. Identify the decision being challenged. People commonly obtain the latest will, earlier wills, the death certificate, probate filings, and a basic list of assets and debts. They also consider whether the real complaint concerns validity or an inadequate share.
  1. Check whether probate has started. A probate court or registry may publish a notice, issue a grant, or set a deadline for objections. Before a grant, some systems allow a formal warning, caveat, or notice that prevents the estate from progressing without notifying the objector.
  1. Collect evidence. Relevant material may include medical records, solicitor or notary files, witness statements, messages, financial records, drafts of the will, and evidence about the will-maker’s relationships and vulnerability near the signing date. Privacy and access rules can restrict medical or professional records.
  1. Obtain advice and assess costs. A lawyer commonly assesses standing, evidence, likely value of the estate, settlement options, and the risk of paying another party’s legal costs. Some disputes are handled under a conditional or capped-fee arrangement, where permitted.
  1. File an objection or court claim. The document and procedure differ. An objection may stop or delay a grant, while a claim may ask the court to declare the will invalid, revoke a grant, admit an earlier will, or determine a beneficiary’s share.
  1. Notify interested people. Executors, beneficiaries, close family members, and sometimes creditors may need notice. They may file evidence supporting or opposing the will.
  1. Try negotiation or mediation. Many estate disputes settle after documents and witness accounts are exchanged. A settlement may involve a payment, a different division of assets, or agreement about costs. Courts may need to approve some settlements involving children or protected adults.
  1. Proceed to a hearing if necessary. The court may hear witnesses, medical or handwriting experts, the drafting professional, and the executor. It may uphold the will, reject it, admit an earlier will, or make another order allowed by local law.

Deadlines and time limits

Probate objections often have short deadlines, commonly measured in days or weeks after notice of an application. In some places, a caveat or similar filing initially lasts for a limited period and must then be supported by further court steps.

Claims for family provision or maintenance commonly have deadlines measured from the grant of probate or administration. Depending on the jurisdiction, typical periods may range from about three months to one year, with limited power to extend them.

A claim based on fraud, forgery, or a later-discovered will may have different rules. Delay can still matter, particularly if estate property has been distributed or sold. Time limits can also differ between challenging the will, recovering property, and making a family-provision claim. You commonly confirm the applicable deadline with the probate registry, court, or a licensed lawyer where you live.

Documents that usually matter

  • The original will and every known earlier or later will
  • The probate application, grant, inventory, and estate accounts
  • Death certificate and evidence of the will-maker’s domicile
  • Medical and care records from around the signing date
  • The drafting lawyer’s or notary’s file and attendance notes
  • Witness statements and details of the people who witnessed signing
  • Communications about the will, gifts, threats, or pressure
  • Bank, property, business, and tax records
  • Evidence of caregiving, dependency, financial need, or contributions to the estate
  • Documents showing a person’s relationship to the will-maker

The original signed document can be especially important. A copy may be accepted, but the court may need evidence explaining where the original went and whether the will-maker destroyed it intending to revoke it.

How it differs by jurisdiction

United States: Probate and will contests are mainly governed by state law. States differ on witness requirements, electronic or handwritten wills, harmless-error rules, no-contest clauses, standing, and limitation periods. A contestant may need to object before the will is admitted or within a short period after notice. Family-protection rules also differ: some states use elective-share rights for spouses, while others provide homestead, exempt-property, or family allowances.

England and Wales: The formal requirements for wills are principally associated with the Wills Act 1837, as amended. Validity challenges commonly concern capacity, knowledge and approval, undue influence, fraud, or execution. A person seeking reasonable financial provision under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 is not necessarily arguing that the will is invalid; the usual period is six months from the grant, subject to the court’s limited power to permit a late claim.

Canada: Wills and estates are mainly provincial or territorial matters. Provinces differ on execution, testamentary capacity, family-support claims, court procedures, and limitation periods. Some jurisdictions recognize broader judicial powers to validate a document that does not meet every formal requirement. A lawyer usually checks the law of the province or territory where the estate is being administered and the location of significant property.

Australia: Succession law is mainly state and territory based. Formal validity, probate procedure, family-provision claims, and deadlines differ between jurisdictions. Family-provision applications commonly have relatively short periods after the grant of probate or letters of administration, often around several months, although extensions may be possible. A challenge may also involve whether a will was made under pressure or whether an informal document should be recognized.

When people consult a lawyer

People commonly seek prompt legal advice when:

  • probate has been filed or a notice gives a short objection period;
  • the will-maker was vulnerable, seriously ill, cognitively impaired, or dependent on another person;
  • there are multiple wills, missing originals, suspicious changes, or possible forgery;
  • a large estate, business, trust, or property in more than one jurisdiction is involved;
  • the person considering a claim is a spouse, child, dependant, caregiver, or financially vulnerable beneficiary;
  • estate assets may be sold, transferred, or distributed soon; or
  • the dispute involves an executor’s conduct, conflicts of interest, or possible misuse of estate funds.

Primary sources

  • StatuteUnited States: State probate and trust codes, state court probate rules, and official probate-court guidance for the relevant state. There is no single nationwide will-contest statute.United States (federal)
  • StatuteUnited States: Uniform Probate Code, especially its probate and time-limit provisions, as published by the Uniform Law Commission (model law; not controlling unless adopted by the state).United States (federal)
  • StatuteEngland and Wales: Wills Act 1837, official legislation.gov.uk.England & Wales
  • StatuteEngland and Wales: Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975, official legislation.gov.uk.England & Wales
  • Official sourceEngland and Wales: The Law Commission, Making a Will, official law-reform materials.England & Wales
  • Official sourceCanada: The wills, estates, and family-support legislation and probate rules of the relevant province or territory; official provincial or territorial legislation websites.Canada
  • Official sourceAustralia: The succession, probate, and family-provision legislation and court rules of the relevant state or territory; official government legislation websites.Australia
  • Official sourceAustralia: Australasian Supreme and Federal Courts Judicial and court-service guidance on probate and estate applications, where applicable.Australia

Links go to official or widely used free sources. Check that a source is current before relying on it. Browse all sources →

Last updated
Sep 26, 2026
Jurisdiction
General — United States, England & Wales, Canada, Australia
Written by
House Legal editorial (AI-generated, earlier format)