Prenuptial and postnuptial agreements

Prenuptial agreements are contracts made before marriage, while postnuptial agreements are made after marriage. They commonly address property, debts, inheritances, business interests, and financial support, but courts may refuse to enforce terms that were obtained unfairly or that improperly affect children or statuto

Jurisdiction
General — United States, England & Wales, Canada, Australia
Topic
Family
Last updated
Sep 26, 2026
Editorial status
Not yet reviewed by a licensed attorney

General legal information, published for everyone. It does not apply the law to anyone’s particular situation and is not legal advice. Laws change and differ by place; check the primary sources below.

Quick summary

  • Prenuptial agreements are contracts made before marriage, while postnuptial agreements are made after marriage.
  • They commonly address property, debts, inheritances, business interests, and financial support, but courts may refuse to enforce terms that were obtained unfairly or that improperly affect children or statutory support rights.

What it means

Prenuptial agreements are contracts made before marriage, while postnuptial agreements are made after marriage. They commonly address property, debts, inheritances, business interests, and financial support, but courts may refuse to enforce terms that were obtained unfairly or that improperly affect children or statutory support rights.

How the law works

How the law usually works

A prenuptial agreement, sometimes called a “prenup,” generally takes effect when the couple marries. A postnuptial agreement, sometimes called a “postnup” or marital agreement, is made during the marriage and may revise earlier arrangements or set financial terms for a possible separation or divorce.

Common subjects include:

  • Which property remains separate and which becomes marital or family property.
  • Responsibility for debts.
  • Ownership or treatment of a business.
  • Inheritances, gifts, and trusts.
  • Life insurance and estate-planning arrangements.
  • How property may be divided if the marriage ends.
  • Whether either spouse will seek spousal or maintenance support.

Courts usually examine both the agreement itself and the circumstances in which it was made. Important factors often include:

  • Voluntary consent: A person may challenge an agreement signed because of threats, coercion, fraud, or extreme pressure.
  • Financial disclosure: Each person usually benefits from receiving reasonably complete information about the other’s assets, debts, income, and business interests. Concealment can undermine enforcement.
  • Independent legal advice: Separate lawyers are strongly associated with enforceability, especially where the terms are unequal or a postnuptial agreement is signed after conflict has arisen.
  • Timing: Signing immediately before a wedding, after wedding plans are difficult to cancel, or during a crisis can support an argument that consent was not voluntary.
  • Understanding: A person generally needs enough time and information to understand the agreement and its consequences.
  • Fairness and public policy: A court may reject an agreement that is unconscionable, seriously one-sided in the circumstances, or inconsistent with mandatory law.

A court may enforce some provisions while refusing others, depending on local law and whether the document allows the provisions to be separated. Child custody, parenting arrangements, and child support usually remain subject to the child’s best interests and mandatory support rules. Parents generally cannot bind a court in advance on those issues.

A postnuptial agreement may receive closer scrutiny because spouses already have legal and financial duties to each other. In some places, the agreement also must satisfy special rules for a married couple’s financial contract.

Common processes

  1. Discuss goals and possible subjects. Couples commonly identify property, debts, businesses, expected inheritances, support, and estate plans. They may also discuss what the agreement will not cover, such as future parenting decisions.
  1. Collect financial information. Each person commonly prepares a schedule of assets, debts, income, business interests, and significant expected property. Supporting records may include account statements, tax returns, valuations, and loan documents.
  1. Obtain separate legal advice. Each person commonly consults a different family-law lawyer. The lawyers may explain local rules, identify risks, negotiate terms, and suggest changes. One lawyer generally should not advise both people on a potentially contested agreement.
  1. Negotiate and prepare a draft. The agreement commonly states the parties’ financial history, disclosures, property classifications, treatment of future property, support provisions, and what happens on death, separation, or divorce. It may coordinate with wills, trusts, beneficiary designations, and business documents.
  1. Allow reasonable time for review. People commonly exchange drafts well before the wedding or, for a postnuptial agreement, before a planned separation or major financial transaction. The signing process may be questioned if one person first sees the final document shortly before the ceremony.
  1. Sign with appropriate formalities. The parties commonly sign the final agreement voluntarily, with required witnesses, notarization, or other formalities. The exact requirements depend on the jurisdiction and the type of property involved.
  1. Keep records and update when circumstances change. Couples commonly retain the signed original and disclosure records. They may review the agreement after a move, birth or adoption, major inheritance, business change, or substantial change in wealth. A later amendment often needs the same or stricter formalities.
  1. Use the agreement if separation occurs. A spouse commonly provides the agreement to the divorce or family court. The court may determine whether it is valid, what it covers, and whether later events or statutory rules limit enforcement.

Deadlines and time limits

Deadlines vary substantially. A challenge to an agreement may need to be raised during divorce or property proceedings, but some legal systems apply limitation periods to contract, property, or support claims. The applicable period may depend on when the agreement was signed, when a defect was discovered, when separation occurred, or when court proceedings began.

Typical sources sometimes provide periods ranging from months to several years for related claims, but there is no reliable universal deadline for prenups or postnups. Estate claims, support claims, and challenges based on fraud or lack of capacity can have separate rules. Courts may also consider delay and whether a person acted as though the agreement were valid.

You can confirm the applicable deadline with the court or a licensed attorney where you live.

Documents that usually matter

  • The signed prenuptial or postnuptial agreement and all amendments.
  • Drafts, emails, text messages, and negotiation notes.
  • Financial disclosure schedules and supporting records.
  • Bank, investment, retirement, loan, mortgage, and credit records.
  • Tax returns, pay records, business accounts, and valuation reports.
  • Evidence about when and how the agreement was presented and signed.
  • Records showing whether each person had separate legal advice.
  • Wills, trusts, beneficiary forms, insurance policies, and business agreements.
  • Marriage certificate, separation documents, and divorce pleadings.
  • Records relevant to children, support, or claims of coercion, fraud, incapacity, or undue influence.

How it differs by jurisdiction

United States: State law usually controls. States differ on disclosure, independent counsel, notarization, treatment of support, and whether an agreement may waive rights in a particular situation. Many states follow versions of the Uniform Premarital and Marital Agreements Act, but adoption and wording vary. Courts commonly distinguish enforceable financial terms from child-related provisions, which generally cannot control the child’s best interests or mandatory support.

England and Wales: Prenups and postnups are not automatically binding in the same way as ordinary statutory rules, but courts give substantial weight to agreements made freely, with understanding, and without unfairness. The Supreme Court’s decision in Radmacher v Granatino is often cited for this approach. The court’s power to make financial orders on divorce remains governed principally by the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, including the parties’ needs and other statutory factors.

Canada: Family law is divided between federal and provincial or territorial law. Provincial statutes commonly regulate domestic contracts, financial disclosure, independent advice, signing formalities, and circumstances allowing a court to set an agreement aside. For example, Ontario’s Family Law Act addresses domestic contracts and allows certain agreements to be disregarded or set aside in specified circumstances. Quebec uses a civil-law system and different rules, including marriage-contract provisions in the Civil Code of Québec.

Australia: These agreements are generally called binding financial agreements. The Family Law Act 1975 provides different forms for agreements made before, during, or after marriage and sets conditions for binding effect, including required legal advice. Courts can set an agreement aside in circumstances such as fraud, unconscionable conduct, or certain forms of hardship. The rules are technical, and wording and advice certificates matter.

When people consult a lawyer

People commonly seek individual legal advice before signing, especially where there is a large wealth difference, a business, an expected inheritance, prior children, immigration or residence in another country, or disagreement about disclosure or support.

Legal advice is particularly important when:

  • The wedding or signing date is near.
  • A person is being asked to sign a postnuptial agreement during marital conflict.
  • One person drafted the entire document.
  • Assets or spouses are connected with more than one state or country.
  • The agreement affects a trust, business, retirement plan, or estate plan.
  • A person suspects hidden assets, pressure, fraud, incapacity, or lack of understanding.
  • Separation or divorce proceedings have already started.

If there is immediate danger, contact emergency services first. A lawyer or domestic-violence service may also help address safe signing arrangements and financial protection.

Primary sources

  • StatuteUniform Law Commission, Uniform Premarital and Marital Agreements Act (2012), United States (model law; adoption varies by state).United States (federal)
  • StatuteUnited States state statutes governing premarital and marital agreements, applicable state (not specified; .United States (federal)Marked “not verified” when this guide was written; confirm against the official source.
  • StatuteMatrimonial Causes Act 1973, United Kingdom, especially financial-remedies provisions, England and Wales.England & Wales
  • CaseRadmacher v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42, Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, England and Wales.England & Wales
  • StatuteFamily Law Act 1975, Australia, provisions concerning binding financial agreements.Australia
  • StatuteFamily Law Act, Ontario, Canada, provisions concerning domestic contracts.Canada
  • StatuteCivil Code of Québec, Québec, Canada, provisions concerning marriage contracts .CanadaMarked “not verified” when this guide was written; confirm against the official source.
  • StatuteFamily Law Act 1985, Canada, federal child-support framework where applicable .CanadaMarked “not verified” when this guide was written; confirm against the official source.

Links go to official or widely used free sources. Check that a source is current before relying on it. Browse all sources →

Last updated
Sep 26, 2026
Jurisdiction
General — United States, England & Wales, Canada, Australia
Written by
House Legal editorial (AI-generated, earlier format)